Regulatory Status by Jurisdiction
Comprehensive tracking of Bitcoin regulatory frameworks across major jurisdictions. Compare legal classifications, ETF availability, custody requirements, and MiCA compliance. Every data point cites primary sources.
Europe
European Union
Western Europe
Framework
Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)
17 use casesUnited Kingdom
Western Europe
Framework
FCA Cryptoasset Registration Regime
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
North America
United States
North America
Framework
Multi-regulator framework (SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, state-level)
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
17 use casesCanada
North America
Framework
CSA Regulatory Framework
Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA)
Asia
Singapore
Southeast Asia
Framework
Payment Services Act (PSA)
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Hong Kong
East Asia
Framework
Licensing regime for virtual asset trading platforms
Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)
Oceania
Australia
Oceania
Framework
ASIC Regulatory Framework
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Full Asset × Jurisdiction Matrix
Overall regulatory status for all tracked Bitcoin assets across every jurisdiction.
Regulatory Stance Legend
Permissive
Clear framework, Bitcoin trading and custody permitted
Evolving
Regulatory framework developing, interim guidance in place
Uncertain
Regulatory position unclear, limited official guidance
Restrictive
Significant restrictions or prohibitions on Bitcoin activities